A friend whose son is only four
described to me the difficulty he's having with Karate. So many
rules – do it this way, no talking or fidgeting, listen to the
teacher – that are very, very challenging for him. I suggested
that maybe on top of preschool (his day care center is pretty
structured) it's just too much. Perhaps what he really needs
after a day at school is to go to the park and just run around. In a
year or two he will have outgrown some of his wiggles and will be
better able to compose himself in order to master a skill. I could
tell my friend was crestfallen. Signing kids up for activities is
what good moms do, right?
In my mind's ear, I hear the wise,
Hungarian-accented voice of the late Magda Gerber, baby and toddler
expert extraordinaire and founder of RIE (Resources for Infant
Educarers.) Magda believed that parents were dragging their very
young children to too many classes and structured experiences: “Gym!
Stim! Svim!” she would hiss disparagingly. Was Magda right?
What's missing in this world of scheduled playdates and pay-to-play,
structured recreation?
One thing that's missing is hanging
out. I think hanging out is way undervalued. Over lunch, another
friend lamented that her five-year-old son doesn't have opportunities
to hang out the same way she did at that age. Her conclusions about
this really got my attention. Later, in an email, she reminisced
“about the nature of the free time and how it affected kids'
behavior in the home. When a kid was out and about, having free time,
the time was truly free. No one watching, no structure, no team
sports, no "play dates". The kids could make all the
decisions and have all the power over that time. So when they got
home they knew that was where they had to please-and-thank-you and
observe the rules. Nowadays every moment is structured, overseen,
corrected – so naturally kids are rebelling more at home. They
never get that time to just do whatever and deal with the
consequences.”
I think she's right
on the money, and I thank her for this insight. In the
“adult-unsupervised world” that I remember from the mid-to-late
fifties (especially in the summer, when we pretty much roamed
free-range) etiquette was fairly relaxed. Nonetheless, we stayed
within bounds by being subjected to the logical consequences of our
behavior – yes, those very same “logical consequences” that
child development folks urge parents to use as discipline! If we
behaved badly, other kids would say “Go home!” or “I don't want
to play with you.” Ouch! But the next day we could start all over
again. Each morning was a fresh opportunity to practice the
self-control needed to norm our behavior to the social standard of
the neighborhood crew. Our tribe's code valued honesty, compromise,
imagination, a sense of adventure, and no hitting. This was hardly
“Lord of the Flies.” We were just a clunky little democracy
trying to keep it together, day after day. I think we all learned a
lot.
Free time allows
kids to be creative, to figure out how not to be bored, to make
mistakes and correct them, and to discover what they actually do (and
don't) enjoy doing. And it also gives kids the opportunity to
learn what other children need and expect of them – something
that often gets buried under the barrage of adult demands and
expectations.
I would love to
hear about what modern parents are doing to re-create the experience
of the neighborhood pack. I know that you can't just turn them out
on the street (even as far back as the '80s, when I was raising my
kids, this was an impossibility.) So what are you doing to give them
a safe but autonomous space, a time and experience that doesn't feel
100% adult-managed? I welcome responses to this site or at
northmediates@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment